Jin Ooi
Overview
Jin has excellent advocacy and an incredibly sophisticated attention to detail ... Jin delivers substantive advice concisely and thoughtfully. He has a phenomenal memory and is across every detail of the multijurisdictional litigation.” - Chambers UK, 2025
Jin Ooi is an intellectual property litigator in the London office of Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. He is experienced in patent litigation and counselling (including on complex damages inquiries). He has worked on matters in the pharmaceutical, chemistry, biotech and life sciences fields (second medical use, biologics/biosimilars, small molecules, DNA sequencing, vaccines, transgenic animal platforms for antibody discovery), in the medical device space (cochlear implants, bone cements), and in the FMCG and consumer products sector (reduced-risk products including tobacco heating products and e-cigarettes, shaving razors, dishwashing tablets, coffee pods and capsules).
He is also experienced in arbitrating trade secrets disputes in the tech (LNG carriers) and aviation sector (airplane components, airport businesses), in addition to litigating antitrust claims and jurisdiction challenges (cathode ray tubes, lithium ion batteries, forklift gas).
His clients have included Pfizer, Viatris, Astellas, Advanced Bionics, Novartis, Regeneron, British American Tobacco, Samsung, Biomet and Procter & Gamble. Jin’s cases are often multi-jurisdictional requiring significant cross-border coordination across multiple forums. In the UK, Jin’s cases have reached the Court of Appeal (Warner-Lambert (x3), BAT (x2), Xiaomi) and the Supreme Court (Warner-Lambert, Regeneron).
Jin is recognised as a Next Generation Partner in both “Intellectual Property: Patents” and “Life Sciences and Healthcare” in the 2021–2025 editions of The Legal 500 UK. With a “keen intellect and considerable knowledge” and noted as a “powerhouse” and “a deep and strategic thinker”, Jin “is renowned for his ability to master knotty issues and has famed round-the-clock responsiveness”, in addition to having “an extremely sharp eye for detail and a wonderful ability to connect points in a case.” A “sharp strategist”, he “has a nose for a good point” and “he is full of good ideas.”
- The Legal 500 UK (2025) noted: “Jin Ooi is extremely clever and very thorough, conscientious and a joy to work with. A standout talent with a real understanding of patent law. He has also a gift for managing diverse aspects of different cases in various jurisdictions, such that litigation is run consistently and efficiently.”
- Chambers UK (2025) noted: “Jin has excellent advocacy and an incredibly sophisticated attention to detail. … Jin is fantastic to work with. He is diligent, calm and keeps a strong grasp of the issues. … Jin delivers substantive advice concisely and thoughtfully. He has a phenomenal memory and is across every detail of the multijurisdictional litigation.”
- JUVE Patent (2022) named him as “one to watch” in UK patent litigation: an “all-rounder”, Jin “stands out for the technical diversity of his cases, from pharmaceuticals to mobile communications to e-cigarettes - as well as his hard work and tenacity.”
- IAM Patent 1000 (2024) noted: “Jin Ooi is another of the set’s seasoned litigators who comes in for high praise: “Jin is an incredibly bright lawyer with a sharp legal mind who works efficiently in high-pressure situations and never loses sight of the customer’s commercial needs. He immediately grasps the essence of the problem in front of him to provide excellent guidance, and is responsive around the clock.” He performs particularly well when faced with intricate legal problems and has worked … in an incredibly complex liability and quantum trial in which they secured an overwhelmingly positive result for the company.”
Prior to joining Kirkland, Jin worked at Allen & Overy LLP in London and before that Corrs Chambers Westgarth in Sydney. In recognition of his work in Australia, Jin was among a select few young lawyers awarded the 2014 Lawyers Weekly 30 Under 30 Awards, and a finalist in two categories in the 2015 Awards. His dual qualifications in law (1st class degree) and pharmacology give him a special insight into, and understanding of, his clients’ legal needs and commercial and regulatory imperatives.
Experience
Representative Matters
Since joining Kirkland, Jin has worked on the following reported cases:
- Successfully representing Astellas and The Regents of the University of California in defeating validity challenges brought by multiple generic companies on patents covering the blockbuster medicine Xtandi® (enzalutamide) for treating prostate cancer: [2024] EWHC 2524 (Pat), with a commentator noting that this is a “rare example of a patent being wholly upheld in a pharmaceutical context”.
- Assisting Xiaomi to successfully obtain interim licence declarations against Panasonic, the appellate judgment described by a commentator as “a landmark decision, one of the most significant SEP-related court rulings ever” and “breaks new ground for the industry and is a spectacular success”: [2024] EWCA Civ 1143.
- Represented Pfizer, Warner-Lambert and Viatris in the “most complex follow-on damages inquiry ever heard before the Patents Court” against the Department of Health, NHS bodies and numerous generic companies arising from cross-undertakings in damages given during the pendency of substantive patent proceedings covering the blockbuster medicine Lyrica® (pregabalin) for treating pain: [2021] EWHC 2182; [2023] EWCA Civ 166; etc. (Named one of the “Top 20 Cases of 2023” by The Lawyer.) Jin also represented Pfizer and Warner-Lambert in the long series of underlying second medical use patent proceedings: [2018] UKSC 56; etc.
- Represented British American Tobacco in a series of UK proceedings against Philip Morris, and coordinating proceedings in Europe and beyond, on patents concerning potentially reduced-risk products including tobacco heating, vaping/e-cigarettes, and modern oral products: [2020] EWHC 1594; [2022] EWHC 1284; [2022] EWCA Civ 1638; [2023] EWHC 854; etc. (Named a 2022 “Europe Cross-border Patent Litigation Team of the Year” at Managing IP’s EMEA Awards).
- Assisting Advanced Bionics in its European patent disputes (including in the UPC) against MED-EL on cochlear implant technologies.
- Advised a global investment firm on patent and life sciences regulatory aspects in respect of medicines for rare diseases and specialty care products.
- Advised CD&R on patent and healthcare regulatory aspects on its potential partnership with Sanofi to acquire a 50% controlling stake in consumer healthcare champion, Opella.
- Represented Regeneron against Kymab on patents covering a transgenic mouse platform for antibody discovery: [2020] UKSC 27.
- Represented a global pharmaceutical company against a generic company on a patent covering an injectable painkilling medicine for short-term pain relief.
- Advised a biopharmaceutical company on patents covering a well-known biologic medicine for treating multiple types of cancer.
- Advised a global healthcare company on SPC protection covering a small molecule medicine for treating leukaemia.
- Advised a global biopharmaceutical company on patents covering a small molecule medicine for treating kidney cancer.
- Advised a biotechnology company on patents covering a well-known biologic medicine for treating eye diseases.
- Advised Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc (ASSIA) on interpretation of a patent licence clause concerning Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) technology.
- Represented Ilford Imaging against Harman Technology in declaratory proceedings concerning a trade mark licence agreement.
Prior to joining Kirkland, Jin worked on the following matters:
Patent Litigation
- Represented Pfizer group Warner-Lambert in enforcing its second medical use patent for blockbuster drug Lyrica (pregabalin) as a pain treatment against numerous generic companies in the UK and across Europe (W-L v Actavis; W-L v Sandoz). Heralded as the IP case of the decade in the UK, it was heard in the Supreme Court in 2018 (having previously been before the Court of Appeal twice) on the most difficult issues in English patent law namely plausibility and infringement of second medical use patents.
- Advised another global innovator pharma company in relation to enforcement issues surrounding its second medical use patent for a chemotherapy medication.
- Advised a life sciences company in navigating the patent landscape in the DNA sequencing space and preparing to clear the way for its human genomic sequencing technology.
- Advised a global healthcare company in anticipated court proceedings seeking declarations of non-infringement related to its influenza vaccines.
- Advised a global pharma company on loss of exclusivity and enforcement strategy in relation to its platelet inhibitor drug.
- Acted for Gillette (Procter & Gamble) in patent proceedings related to its Mach3 razor (Gillette v Edgewell).
- Advised a multinational tobacco company on the validity of patents related to next generation vaping products, and freedom to operate issues.
Other IP / Pharma Litigation
- Represented the Australian Department of Health in unprecedented litigation claiming compensation arising from increased subsidies paid under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme pursuant to cross-undertakings in damages given by pharma companies in patent proceedings concerning clopidogrel and venlafaxine (Commonwealth v Sanofi; Commonwealth v Wyeth).
- Defended the Department of Health and Therapeutic Goods Administration in merits and judicial reviews concerning pricing decisions and the de-registration and listing cancellation of prescription and complementary medicines from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (Aspen v Minister; Sanofi v Minister; Cat Media v Minister).
- Advised the Department of Health on all aspects of the operation of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, including on matters concerning pricing and supply, and implications of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee's recommendations.
- Assisted British American Tobacco Australasia on its high profile constitutional challenge against the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act.
- Assisted Allergan in Australian trade mark opposition appeal proceedings on “No-Tox” (Allergan v Di Giacomo).
Trade Secrets Litigation
- Defended a global aerospace and defence company in an ICC arbitration claim on misappropriation of confidential information in breach of a non-disclosure agreement.
- Acted for an airport company in LCIA arbitration involving disclosures of confidential information.
- Defended Biomet in trade secrets litigation concerning bone cements (Heraeus v Biomet).
- Acted for a multinational heavy industries company in anticipated disputes concerning alleged breaches of confidence under a technical assistance and licence agreement, in particular in relation to the licensor's patent rights and non-patented practical technical information.
Antitrust Litigation
- Acted for Samsung SDI in jurisdiction challenges in respect of EU cartel damages claim relating to (i) cathode ray tubes (iiyama v Schott) and (ii) lithium-ion batteries (Microsoft Mobile v Sony). Both matters were nominated in 2017 and 2018 respectively for the "Litigation of the year - Cartel Defence" category in the Global Competition Review awards.
- Acted for the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission in a forklift gas cartel dispute (ACCC v Renegade Gas).
Prior Experience
Allen & Overy, London
- Senior Associate (2017–2018)
- Associate (2014–2017)
Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Sydney, Australia
- Associate (2012–2014)
- Law Graduate (2011)
More
Thought Leadership
Publications
“Patent Litigation 2019: Trends and Developments”, Chambers and Partners Practice Guides, 2019
“UK Patent Law: Hot Topics of 2018 and What’s Ahead”, Law360, 2019
“Actavis v Eli Lilly: outcomes”, IPPro, 2018
“Book review: Intellectual Property in Australia”, The IPKat, 2017
“Applying Cartier v. BSkyB to UK life sciences patents”, Law360, 2016
“Caught in the middle: ISPs face blocking orders after Cartier case”, Intellectual Property Magazine, 2016
“The utility of the Cartier case in the life sciences context”, Intellectual Property Magazine, 2016
“The International Arbitration Review (Chapter: Australia)” (3rd, 4th and 5th eds), Law Business Research, 2012-2014
Seminars
Speaker, “Hot topics in patent litigation - a practitioner’s view”, Intellectual Property Law Discussion Group, University of Oxford, 2019
Speaker, “Insufficiency and the many shades of plausibility”, Young EPLAW Congress, Brussels, 2018
Speaker, “Where are we now with plausibility?”, Young EPLAW Congress, Brussels, 2017
Speaker, “What companies need to know about the Bolar exemption”, C5 EU Pharmaceutical Regulatory Law conference, London, 2016
Speaker, “Implications of Brexit for IP and IT legal practice”, LexisNexis webinar, London, 2016
Speaker, “Second medical use - the UK perspective”, Future of Innovation in Medicine: Incentives for New Medical Treatments and Global Health conference, Seattle, 2015
Moderator, “Drug development and approval process with its part in exclusivity”, Future of Innovation in Medicine: Incentives for New Medical Treatments and Global Health conference, Seattle, 2015
Recognition
Chambers UK, 2023–2024 (Up and Coming); 2025 (Band 4 - Intellectual Property: Patent Litigation)
IAM Patent 1000, 2021–2024
JUVE Patent, 2022–2023
The Legal 500 UK, 2020 (Rising Star - Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology); 2021–2025 (Next Generation Partner - Intellectual Property: Patents & Life Sciences and Healthcare)
Legal Media Group Expert Guides (Rising Stars), 2021–2022 (Life Sciences)
Managing IP EMEA Awards, 2022 (European Cross-border Patent Litigation Team of the Year for British American Tobacco; UK Impact Case of the Year for Dr Reddy’s Laboratories v Warner-Lambert Company)
Managing IP IP Stars, 2021 (Notable Practitioner); 2022–2024 (Patent Star)
Who’s Who Legal (WWL): IP, 2023–2024 (recommended)
WIPR Leaders, 2021–2024
Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, 2024–2025 (Life Sciences Law)
Memberships & Affiliations
AIPPI: International Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property
EPLAW: European Patent Lawyers Association
The Law Society of England and Wales
The Law Society of New South Wales (Australia)
Credentials
Admissions & Qualifications
- 2017, Entitled to exercise Higher Rights of Audience (Civil Advocacy)
- 2016, Admitted to practice as a Solicitor of England and Wales
- 2012, Admitted to practice as a Solicitor in the Federal Courts of Australia
- 2011, Admitted to practice as a Solicitor of New South Wales, Australia
Education
- University of OxfordPostgraduate Diploma in Intellectual Property Law and Practice2016
- College of Law, SydneyGraduate Diploma in Legal Practice2011
- University of SydneyLL.B.First Class Honours2010
- University of SydneyB.Sc., PharmacologyAdvanced2008