John C. O'Quinn, P.C.
Overview
John O’Quinn’s practice focuses on litigation, including intellectual property disputes, regulatory matters, commercial litigation, and other complex litigation matters at the trial and appellate levels. He has argued over a hundred appeals in courts throughout the country, including over fifty in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He is recognized in Chambers, and for each of the past eight years he has been named in the IAM Patent 1000, particularly for his work in the Federal Circuit. Clients have described him as an “appellate high flier” who “is outstanding as both an oral advocate and brief writer.” His work was recognized by Managing Intellectual Property, which named Kirkland its Appellate Firm of the Year in 2019. He has also been recognized in the National Law Journal, The Legal 500, the Financial Times and in Law360, where he was named a “Rising Star” in appellate litigation. Representative clients include Abbott, BASF, Charter Communications, Eli Lilly, GSK, Honeywell, IBM, Intel, Motorola, Schlumburger and Teva.
From 2006 to 2009, John served in the U.S. Department of Justice. As Deputy Associate Attorney General, he was responsible for helping to oversee much of the government’s civil litigation and reviewing proposed settlements of multi-million dollar civil cases brought by or against the government. As the Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Federal Programs Branch of the Civil Division, John supervised more than 100 attorneys charged with defending the constitutionality of federal statutes and regulations, representing the diplomatic and national security interests of the United States in court, and conducting significant Title VII, personnel, social security, Medicare and Medicaid-related litigation. John worked with counsel from virtually every federal agency on complex civil litigation matters and personally directed significant cases defending the government’s interests, arguing more than 20 cases in federal court. In February of 2009, John was awarded the Office of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service for his leadership in defending the Department of Defense in lawsuits challenging the detention and trial of enemy combatants captured abroad by United States Armed Forces.
John was previously an associate with Kirkland from 2003 to 2006. While on leave from the Firm, he served as special counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary for the nomination of Chief Justice Roberts. Prior to joining the Firm, John was a law clerk for Justice Antonin Scalia of the U.S. Supreme Court and Judge David Sentelle of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
While at Kirkland, John has also provided legal counseling and representation for individuals and organizations on a pro bono basis, including arguing a habeas petition on behalf of a defendant convicted of capital murder; submitting FOIA requests on behalf of a civil rights organization; challenging a state’s involuntary medication of competent patients on behalf of a disability rights organization; representing federal judges challenging Congress' failure to provide guaranteed COLAs as violating the Compensation Clause of the U.S. Constitution; and representing raisin farmers in their Supreme Court case challenging the federal government’s unconstitutional taking of a portion of their crops.
Experience
Representative Matters
Intellectual Property
- PACT v. Intel Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2023): Successfully obtained three reversals of PTAB decisions finding patents non-obvious – one in precedential decision rejecting the argument that motivation to combine requires expectation of better/more efficient results, as opposed to just suitable results.
- Sequoia v. IBM, Red Hat, et al. (Fed. Cir. 2023): Successfully defended claim constructions supporting the judgment of noninfringement in a precedential decision protecting Red Hat’s customers’ accused products and Linux technology services.
- Par/Endo v. Eagle Pharmaceuticals (Fed. Cir. 2022): Obtained a precedential decision establishing a bright line rule holding an ANDA’s representations controls the infringement inquiry, not evidence outside that specification.
- Wi-LAN v. Sharp Electronics (Fed. Cir. 2021): Successfully obtained an important precedential decision rigorously enforcing limits on use of expert testimony to backfill evidentiary gaps—requiring actual evidence from third parties that have exclusive control over evidence of how their components operate in defendants’ products.
- BotM8 v. Sony (Fed. Cir. 2021): Obtained the first-ever precedential opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit holding that a patent owner’s allegations of direct infringement were insufficiently pled to satisfy the Supreme Court’s Twombly/Iqbal pleading standards, affirming district court dismissal in relevant part.
- BASF v. SNF (Fed. Cir. 2020): Successfully argued for reversal of district court decision invalidating BASF’s patent on 3 separate grounds. In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit significantly clarified the law on when confidential materials can and cannot constitute invalidating prior art.
- Oyster Optics v. Cisco Systems (Fed. Cir. 2019–2020): Successfully argued that patent owner’s settlement in related case served to release defendants from continued assertion of patent claims.
- Marcel Fashions Group, Inc. v. Lucky Brand (2d Cir. & S. Ct. 2019–2020): Briefed long-running trademark dispute in the Supreme Court, successfully advocating to abolish the 2nd Circuit’s “defense preclusion” test and restore predictability and stability to preclusion law.
- Microspherix LLC. v. Merck (Fed. Cir. 2019–2020): Won a pivotal appeal defending Microspherix’s patent against invalidity challenges by Merck.
- Cobalt Boats v. Brunswick (Fed. Cir. 2018–2019): Successfully argued for reversal of jury verdict of infringement based on both literal and equivalents infringement theories.
- Honeywell v. Arkema (Fed. Cir. 2018–2019): Successfully argued for reversal of PTAB decision that had precluded Honeywell from seeking a patent owner correction during Patent Office proceedings.
- Enzo Life Sciences v. Abbott Labs (Fed. Cir. 2018–2019): Successfully defended decision on summary judgment invalidating broad claims to a genetic probe as non-enabled.
- Eagle View Technologies v. Xactware (Fed. Cir. 2018–2019): Successfully defended Patent Office’s decision upholding the validity of patented aerial roof measurement technology.
- WesternGeco (Schlumburger) v. ION Geophysical (E.D. Tex., Fed. Cir. & S. Ct. 2012–2018): Obtained judgment of patent infringement, defended reasonable royalty on appeal, obtained two decisions from the Supreme Court reversing Federal Circuit limitations on damages, defended royalty on remand from the Supreme Court.
- Allergan v. Sandoz (E.D. Tex. & Fed. Cir. 2016–2017): Successfully argued on appeal that the district court’s finding of infringement should be reversed under a proper understanding of the claims.
- Arista v. International Trade Commission & Cisco (Fed. Cir. 2017): Defended the ITC’s decision finding Arista infringed Cisco’s patents, and defended the scope of the exclusion order.
- In re Warsaw Orthopedic (Fed. Cir. 2016): Argued on behalf of patentee and obtained a rare remand from the Federal Circuit to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of a finding of obviousness.
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Cisco (Fed. Cir. 2014–2016): Argued case on appeal for Cisco involving apportionment and standardization issues; vacated and remanded for new determination of damages.
- ViiV Healthcare v. Lupin (Fed. Cir. 2014-2015): Argued case on appeal, affirmed judgment of non-obviousness of multi-billion dollar HIV pharmaceuticals.
General Litigation
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. Becerra (S.D. Ind. & 7th Cir. 2021-2022): Successfully briefed and argued complex constitutional and administrative law challenges to HHS’s reinterpretations of a federal healthcare statute; obtained preliminary injunction on certain regulations and summary judgment on others; case now pending on appeal.
- U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu (7th Cir. 2021): Argued appeal and led the briefing and strategy in an important, precedent-setting decision holding that the objective knowledge standard the Supreme Court articulated in Safeco Insurance v. Burr, also applies to the False Claims Act’s scienter requirement.
- U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway (7th Cir. 2022): Argued appeal and led the briefing and strategy in another important False Claims Act case in which the Seventh Circuit clarified what kinds of regulatory documents constitute “authoritative guidance” that would render a defendant’s otherwise reasonable, but erroneous, conduct unreasonable.
- U.S. ex. rel. Olhausen v. Arriva (11th Cir. 2022): Argued appeal and led the briefing and strategy on appeal in another important decision on the scope of the False Claims Act’s scienter requirement.
- Kinder Morgan v. United States (S.D. Tex. 2020). Successfully challenged the government’s sequestration of tax refunds. Raised novel legal arguments at the intersection of tax law and the Administrative Procedure Act. The government confessed error, agreed to pay the refunds it previously sequestered, plus interest, and took the extraordinary step of voluntarily agreeing to pay refunds to all other taxpayers similarly situated.
- Sun Capital Partners v. New England Teamsters Pension Fund (1st Cir. 2018–2019): Successfully argued for reversal of finding of withdrawal liability under ERISA based on a theory of implied partnership.
- In re Millennium Lab Holdings (3d Cir. 2016–2019): Successfully argued in Bankruptcy Court, District Court, and the Third Circuit that inclusion of third-party releases in a Plan of Reorganization did not violate the Constitution under Stern v. Marshall.
- Marcel Fashions Group, Inc. v. Lucky Brand (2d Cir. & S. Ct. 2019-2020): Briefed long-running trademark dispute in the Supreme Court, successfully advocating to abolish the 2nd Circuit’s “defense preclusion” test and restore predictability and stability to preclusion law.
- U.S. ex rel Colquitt v. Abbott Laboratories (5th Cir. 2017): Successfully defended trial win for Abbott Laboratories in a billion-dollar False Claims Act case alleging that Abbott promoted its biliary stents for off-label use in vascular stenting procedures that were then billed to Medicare.
- In re Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (7th Cir. 2015): Argued successfully that Section 105 injunctions of third-party litigation should be granted when they will enhance the prospects for a successful resolution of the bankruptcy.
- Horne v. U.S. Dep’t of Agriculture (9th Cir. & Supreme Court 2013–2015): Successfully represented raisin farmers in challenge to USDA unconstitutional taking of a portion of farmers’ crop.
- Independent Pilots Ass’n v. FAA (D.C. Cir. 2015–2016): Intervened on behalf of Cargo Airline Association and successfully defended FAA flight duty rule.
- National Chicken Council v. EPA, et al. (D.C. Cir. 2011-2012): Successfully argued on behalf of Intervenors that a challenge to Federal Renewable Fuel Standards should be dismissed for lack of standing.
- In re Charter Communications (S.D.N.Y., 2d Cir. & S. Ct. 2009–2013): Counsel for Charter in multi-billion dollar bankruptcy confirmation proceeding. Argued on behalf of Charter in the District Court and the Second Circuit. Successfully defended plan of reorganization in multiple appeals and against certiorari.
Clerk & Government Experience
Deputy Assistant Attorney GeneralUnited States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch2008–2009
Deputy Associate Attorney GeneralUnited States Department of Justice2006–2008
Special CounselUnited States Senate Committee on the JudiciaryJuly–September 2005
Law ClerkHonorable Antonin ScaliaSupreme Court of the United States2002–2003
Law ClerkHonorable David SentelleUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit2001–2002
Prior Experience
Research Assistant to Professor Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School, 2000–2001
Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany, Engineering Intern, 1998
Dow Chemical Company, Freeport, Texas, Engineering Intern, 1998
Exxon Chemical Company, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Engineering Intern, 1996
More
Thought Leadership
Press Mentions:
Quoted, “4 Proposed Fed. Circ. Rule Changes Attorneys Should Know,” Law360 (April 29, 2020)
Publications
What’s Next For Issue Preclusion And Patent Invalidity, Law360 (June 28, 2018)
A Spectrum of Abuse at FCC?, The Washington Times (July 25, 2004)
Three Strikes for the FCC: Government regulation stifles the telecom industry, National Review Online (March 18, 2004) (with Jay Lefkowitz)
Protecting Private Intellectual Property from Government Intrusion: Revisiting SmithKline and the Case for Just Compensation 29 PEPP. L. REV. 435 (2002)
There's No Place Like Home: Finding Personal Jurisdiction in ANDA Patent Cases After Zeneca v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, 10 FED. CIR. B. J. 335 (2000), reprinted from 13 HARV. J. L. & TECH. 129 (1999) (Second Place Winner of the Federal Circuit Bar Association's 2000 George Hutchinson Writing Competition)
Note, Not-So-Strict Liability: A Forseeability Test for Rylands v. Fletcher and Other Lessons from Cambridge Water Co. v. Eastern Counties Leather plc, 24 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 287 (2000)
Seminars
Speaker, "Federal Circuit Appeals and Remands to the PTAB: Recent Lessons and a Look Ahead," IP Chat Channel webinar, Intellectual Property Owners Association (November 8, 2018)
Recognition
Chambers USA, America’s Leading Lawyers for Business, 2022–2024
Managing Intellectual Property, Finalist, Appellate Practitioner of the Year, 2022
The Am Law Litigation Daily, Litigator of the Week, March 19, 2021
LMG Life Sciences Impact Case of the Year 2020
The Legal 500 United States for Patents: Litigation (Full Coverage), 2020–2022
Managing Intellectual Property, Appellate Firm of the Year, 2019
The Legal 500 United States for Trademarks: Litigation, 2018–2019
IAM Patent 1000 – The World’s Leading Patent Professionals, 2014–2022
The Legal 500 United States for Appellate, 2017–2018, 2020–2024
The National Law Journal, Litigation Trailblazers of the Year, 2015
Financial Times, North America Innovative Lawyers, 2015
The Am Law Litigation Daily, Litigators of the Week, October 8, 2015
The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi National Board of Directors, 2012–2014
Law360 Appellate Rising Star, 2013
The Legal 500 United States for Trade Secrets, 2013
Office of the Secretary of Defense Medal for Exceptional Public Service, 2009
Special Commendation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 2008
Eagle Scout, Boy Scouts of America
Credentials
Admissions & Qualifications
- 2004District of Columbia
- 2001North Carolina
Courts
- Supreme Court of the United States
- United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Education
- Harvard Law SchoolJ.D.magna cum laude2001
Fay Diploma (graduated first in class)
Sears Prize (awarded to the two students with highest GPA in second year)
Editor-In-Chief, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
- Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyM.S., Chemical Engineering Practice1998National Science Foundation Fellowship
- University of OxfordM.Sc., Environmental Change and Managementwith Distinction1997Fulbright Scholar
- North Carolina State UniversityB.S., Chemical Engineering; B.A., Multidisciplinary Studiessumma cum laude1996
Valedictorian
Phi Beta Kappa
Phi Kappa Phi
Student Body President, 1995–1996